C. Loring Brace

C. Loring Brace (born 1930) is an anthropologist at the University of Michigan. He considers the attempt "to introduce a Darwinian outlook into biological anthropology" to be his greatest contribution to the field of anthropology.[1]

Contents

Life and work

Charles Loring Brace IV was born in Hanover, New Hampshire in 1930, a son of the writer, sailor, boat builder and teacher, Gerald Warner Brace and Hulda Potter Laird. His ancestors were New England schoolteachers and clergymen including, John P. Brace, Sarah Pierce, and the Rev. Blackleach Burritt. Brace's paternal great-grandfather, Charles Loring Brace, had worked to introduce evolution theory to America and had even corresponded with Charles Darwin. C. Loring Brace developed an early interest in biology and human evolution as a child in part by reading Roy Chapman Andrews's popular book Meet your Ancestors, A Biography of Primitive Man (1945). He entered Williams College in Williamstown, Massachusetts, but the college did not offer a degree in anthropology, so Brace constructed his own major from geology, paleontology, and biology courses.

Brace entered Harvard University in 1952 and studied physical anthropology with Ernest Hooton and later with William Howells, who introduced Brace to the new evolutionary synthesis of Darwinian evolution and population genetics. During this time he was also able to travel to Europe where he spent 1959-1960 at Oxford University, in the animal behavior laboratory of Niko Tinbergen, and traveled to Zagreb, Yugoslavia, where he inspected the collection of Neanderthal fossils collected by Dragutin Gorjanovic-Kramberger at Krapina.

Brace completed his Ph.D. in 1962. He taught briefly at the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee and then at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He has spent much of his career as Professor of Anthropology at the University of Michigan and as Curator of Biological Anthropology at the university's Museum of Anthropology.

Neanderthal studies

In 1962, Brace published a paper in American Anthropologist titled "Refocusing on the Neanderthal Problem" where he argued, in opposition to French anthropologist Henri Vallois, that the archeological and fossil evidence did not necessarily support the idea that the Neanderthals were replaced by Cro-Magnon populations migrating into Europe, rather than being ancestral to early Homo sapiens.

Brace continued his reappraisal of the Neanderthal problem in 1964 in "The Fate of the 'Classic' Neanderthals: a consideration of hominid catastrophism" published in Current Anthropology. Here Brace traced the history of research on the Neanderthals in order to show how interpretations established early in the century by Marcellin Boule and notions such as Arthur Keith's pre-sapiens theory had convinced many anthropologists that the Neanderthals played little or no role in the evolution of modern humans. Brace argued that cultural factors, especially the increased use of tools by Neanderthals, produced morphological changes that led the classic Neanderthals to evolve into modern humans.

Brace has remained a vigorous proponent of the idea that Neanderthals are ancestral to modern humans. He also argued that the fossil record suggests a simple evolutionary scheme whereby humans have evolved through four stages (Australopithecine, Pithecanthropine, Neanderthal, and Modern humans), and that these stages are somewhat arbitrary and reflect our limited knowledge of the fossil record. Brace has emphasized the need to integrate the ideas of Darwinian evolution into palaeoanthropology. Much earlier research into human origins relied on non-Darwinian models of evolution; Brace's presented his advocacy of the Darwinian approach in The Stages Of Human Evolution, first published in 1967.

Brace's ideas have generated considerable controversy, as much for his brash criticism of his colleagues as for their content, but they have also influenced a generation of anthropological research into human evolution and the interpretation of the Neanderthals.

Other studies

In the publication "Clines and clusters versus Race: a test in ancient Egypt and the case of a death on the Nile", Brace discusses the controversy concerning the race of the Ancient Egyptians. Brace argues that the "Egyptians have been in place since back in the Pleistocene and have been largely unaffected by either invasions or migrations".[1]

In a 2006 publication "The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form", Brace argues that Natufian peoples, who are thought to be the source of the European Neolithic, had Sub-Saharan African admixture.[2]

Works

Past PhD Students (Alphabetical order)

References

  1. ^ Brace, C. Loring; Tracer, David P.; Yaroch, Lucia Allen; Robb, John; Brandt, Kari; Nelson, A. Russell (2005), "Clines and clusters versus ‘Race’: a test in ancient Egypt and the case of a death on the Nile", American Journal of Physical Anthropology 36 (S17): 1–31, doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330360603 
  2. ^ Brace, C. Loring; Seguchi, Noriko; Quintyn, Conrad B.; Fox, Sherry C.; Nelson, A. Russell; Manolis, Sotiris K.; Qifeng, Pan (2006), "The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form", PNAS 103 (1): 242–247, doi:10.1073/pnas.0509801102, PMC 1325007, PMID 16371462, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1325007 

External links